"Horse Paste" - A Major CANCER-KILLER?
After being suppressed worldwide for successfully treating COVID-19, Ivermectin now demonstrates a new superpower: killing cancer.
The ‘Miracle Drug’ with seemingly infinite benefits just got another notch in its belt: crushing cancer.
You’ve probably heard of ivermectin by now, and if you haven’t, you’ve probably heard of the slurs and misleading labels, “horse paste” and “horse dewormer.”
Turns out, the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex and its media finger-puppets have done their absolute darnedest to defy and demonize all mentions of this powerful, broad-spectrum cure-all.
But that, of course, hasn’t stopped the facts from leaving the fiction. As Martin Luther King once said, “The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward Justice.”
Well, the same can be said for the Truth.
The story begins in early 2020 amid the chaos of COVID-19, when videos are circulating from China, Italy, and inside our own supposed hospital death grounds, indicating just how bad this thing may get.
At this point, nobody knows. Well, at least not most people. The virus is fresh and the media fear is running full throttle.
And then Trump does it. The Cardinal Sin - championing a well-known anti-malaria drug, hydroxychloroquine, for its possible efficacy against the China Virus.
Soon later, as the world scrambles for answers and unheralded doctors fight valiantly on the front lines, another long-used, long-praised anti-parasitic enters the public consciousness: Ivermectin.
Now, the battle is on. In virtual lockstep, all the major networks, medical institutions, and gatekeeper bureaucracies make their move. “You are not a horse,” the FDA admonishes Americans.
Stories appear across the spectrum of publications, from ad hominem attacks to fraudulent tales of “patients overdosing” as they clog up hospitals and ambulances.
All of the presiding medical authorities echo the message: ivermectin does not work against COVID-19, we are told. There is no evidence. Worse, it can cause potentially fatal outcomes - and it is!
The American Medical Association (AMA), the American Pharmacists Association (APhA), and the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) all join in, citing a lack of evidence for ivermectin’s use against COVID-19, and once again, claiming an “increase in calls to poison control reporting overdoses and adverse effects.”
The CDC even issues an Emergency Newsletter:
“Clinicians and public health practitioners should educate patients about the risks of using ivermectin without an indication or prescription, as well as about the risks of ingesting ivermectin products that are meant solely for external use or veterinary use. COVID-19 vaccination is safe and the most effective means to prevent infection and protect against severe disease and death from SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Clinicians are strongly encouraged to educate patients to use proven COVID-19 prevention measures, especially getting vaccinated and boosted as soon as eligible, and use FDA-authorized treatment.”
Clearly, ivermectin is incredibly dangerous. So dangerous, in fact, that hospitals refuse to administer it even after the threat of violence, and doctors - fighting on the front lines - receive bans and have their practices dismantled for prescribing the unimaginably harmful pharmaceutical.
It is so terribly bad and misused, that regulators have to completely prohibit its use for COVID-19 in some countries. In the states, Walmart refuses to fill many prescriptions and then defeats a lawsuit filed by patients denied the drug.
But who can blame these pharmacies, and hospitals, and clinics, and medical institutions, and media white coats? After all, there are no clinical trials showing this thing is efficacious. Never mind that there is no time at the outset of this virulent coronavirus - that’s irrelevant.
What matters is that millions upon millions are using “horse paste,” choking and dying on their own stupidity and mistrust of mainstream medicine. As for the countless doctors working overtime, risking their lives, missing their families and friends, and using the medicine at the forefront of COVID-19 treatment?
Liars, fools, and charlatans, all of ’em.
When Narratives Crumble
When the safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines became available in late 2020, many people proclaimed that they were “FDA-approved.” This, of course, was a common misconception. Pushed through at warp speed due to an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), the mRNA injections did not meet the normal safety and efficacy standards.
In fact, the injections themselves were categorically not approved. Rather, they were FDA-authorized “unapproved medical products.” These products - distributed worldwide - have since been shown to be highly contaminated, calling into question if they were even the same product used in certain clinical trials.
But none of this seemed to matter at the time of the EUA:
Thinking back on all we have learned in the past three years, from PCR threshold inflation to differing manufacturing ‘processes,’ it should come as no surprise that the Pandemic was fear-mongered to the hilt.
Just consider the EUA requirements above. One of the most critical statutory requirements is the last one: “There is no adequate, approved, and available alternative.”
Could that be why ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were so demonized by captured industries, media shills, and other institutional gatekeepers? Could that be why we were incessantly told that the completely harmless shots were “safe and effective” while ivermectin was “unsafe and unproven” for use against COVID-19?
Did the regulatory bodies and medical establishments have to smear and suppress any potentially adequate, approved, and available products? Did they have to prevent such adequacy, approval, and availability from being realized?
Did anyone who used these products - including renowned specialists and experts - have to be maligned and silenced, their lives and livelihoods threatened for even mentioning the possibility of alternative treatments?
Well, that might depend… Was ivermectin actually safe and effective?
A History of Miracles
Unbeknownst to many vaunted medical experts, apparently, ivermectin has an incredible history of use. Believe it or not, it’s more than just some equine paste - there are topical and tablet forms as well - and its applications and mechanisms of action go back decades.
In fact, the mastermind behind the drug, Satoshi Omura, won a Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for the drug’s discovery. And since its humble beginnings in treating river blindness and elephantiasis, the administration of ivermectin has expanded exponentially:
“Discovered in the late-1970s, the pioneering drug ivermectin, a dihydro derivative of avermectin—originating solely from a single microorganism isolated at the Kitasato Institute, Tokyo, Japan from Japanese soil—has had an immeasurably beneficial impact in improving the lives and welfare of billions of people throughout the world. Originally introduced as a veterinary drug, it kills a wide range of internal and external parasites in commercial livestock and companion animals. It was quickly discovered to be ideal in combating two of the world’s most devastating and disfiguring diseases which have plagued the world’s poor throughout the tropics for centuries. It is now being used free-of-charge as the sole tool in campaigns to eliminate both diseases globally. It has also been used to successfully overcome several other human diseases and new uses for it are continually being found. This paper looks in depth at the events surrounding ivermectin’s passage from being a huge success in Animal Health into its widespread use in humans, a development which has led many to describe it as a “wonder” drug.”
Of course, most people don’t know this information. Most people don’t know that ivermectin is a product with wide-ranging effects that are still reshaping the medical landscape of patient care today.
The sheer number of treatments approved and administered, and the overwhelming safety profile, would seem to contradict many of the alleged dangers of the drug…
Given ivermectin’s multifaceted profile, it’s no wonder that many people have since found its use in treating COVID-19.
And the research backs their claims.
The Medical Gatekeepers may claim that the drug did not work for COVID-19, but the avalanche of evidence undermines them at every turn. According to over 95 studies from around the world, when ivermectin is properly administered for COVID-19, “statistically significant lower risk is seen for mortality, ventilation, ICU admission, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance.”
In fact, over 20 countries have used ivermectin, covering more than 27% of the planet’s population.
The facts stand starkly.
So, the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex, in its infinite good faith, established The Narrative. The Narrative uprooted those who were using ivermectin in all conceivable scenarios. The Narrative denied, suppressed, and attacked studies finding ivermectin useful against COVID-19. The Narrative ensured that the safe and effective vaccines were perceived as the only viable treatments for COVID-19.
The Narrative caused millions to die unnecessarily. And perhaps, the most alarming part of all this? The fact that the effectiveness of ivermectin against COVID-19 was known since the very beginning…
A Plan for the Ages
Following the first outbreak of SARS in 2003 (caused by a coronavirus), The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) got to work. By 2015 or 2016, the agency informed the CDC that ivermectin in particular was the number one product to use in the event of a coronavirus pandemic!
And because the medication had been used for decades already, it was known to be an incredibly easy, inexpensive, and profoundly safe treatment. For COVID-19, ivermectin was “identified as curative” as it “works throughout all phases of illness because it both inhibits viral replication and modulates the immune response.”
Just as bad, if not worse, is the fact that the ineffectiveness of the “vaccine” was also known. More troubling was the fact that “the vaccine recipient has no defense against the bloodstream entry” of the spike protein, whereas “their nose protects them from the recombinant spike protein quasispecies during natural infection.”
In other words, the “vaccine” is worse than natural infection. And it’s not a vaccine, it’s a bioweapon: “synthetic replication of the already-synthetic” spikes.
As it turns out, the deeper you dig, the more you find that this was all planned. The lies, the facades, the deceptions, and manipulation - all premeditated, all-powerful in modulating the minds of billions.
When people use the term Plandemic, they’re not being cutesy. It’s as literal as it fucking gets. We’re under attack. We’ve been under attack. Psychological warfare. Physical warfare. Spiritual warfare. The warfare cannot be denied.
The mRNA bioweapon causes broad-spectrum, short-, mid-, and long-term damages that we are still just discovering. And one of those most devastating damages is “turbo cancer.”
KNOWN CANCER "Promoter" In Pfizer Vaccine Not Disclosed to FDA
It just keeps getting wilder. In the Saga of the “Vaccine,” we’re quickly discovering that for every worst-case scenario, reality’s worse. Now, prominent members of the anti-vaxxer conspiracy theorist wacko community - also known as rational thinkers - have unearthed a
A New Treatment Against An Ancient Killer?
For many, the “C” word is like a death sentence. Even if it’s not an aggressive form or an especially deadly type, the mere mention of the word is enough to strike fear in our hearts, darkness in our minds, and fatigue in our bones and bodies. It siphons our will to fight, leaving our faculties drained, withered, and broken.
If we let it. If we can’t find a way to eradicate it.
But what if there’s a way? What if the typical chemotherapies constantly pushed and used are largely unnecessary? Not just unnecessary, but purposely harmful and deadly?
Since its registration for human use in 1987, ivermectin has shown myriad potential in treating everything from trichinosis to bedbugs, rosacea, asthma, epilepsy, neurological disease, HIV, ulcers, other viruses and bacteria, and of course, cancer.
From breast cancer to all cancers, the powerful benefits of ivermectin seem to have no bounds. In fact, the latest research has now identified at least 15 mechanisms of action against cancer:
Moreover, others have speculated that ivermectin’s abilities to fight cancers also coincide with its potency in combating the effects of aging. After all, what are many cancers caused by? Disruption and dysregulation in normal bodily processes. Inflammation. DNA damage. Recurring issues that are not repaired and restored by the immune system.
Could ivermectin also be the new anti-aging drug?
Sound too good to be true? Unlikely but possible? Possible but improbable? Improbable but not impossible? Whether you think ivermectin is the panacea we’ve all been searching for, or minimally effective, one question seems to float above all others…
How the hell does an anti-parasitic affect cancer?
The question is a good one, and while it may seem crazy to suggest that fighting cancer often means fighting parasites, the truth is: The Science has known this for a while.
A former postdoc at the Broad Institute of MIT, respected cancer biologist Ravid Straussman knows a thing or two about anticancer therapies. His research at the Institute would lead him to explore a rather novel and unorthodox position: that tumors are not sterile. As Straussman and colleagues soon discovered, not only did bacteria love tumors, but they even helped cancer cells survive chemotherapy:
“When Straussman accepted a faculty position at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel in 2013, he decided to pursue this line of research. Along with Weizmann colleagues and collaborators back at the Broad, Straussman sequenced samples from 113 human pancreatic cancers and scoured the results for bacterial DNA. Sure enough, the researchers found genetic signatures of bacteria in 76 percent of them. ‘We never found Mycoplasma in pancreatic cancer, but we found many other bacteria,’ says Straussman, ‘and we found that [when] we isolated these bacteria from tumors, they can also rescue cancer cells from chemotherapy’ ”
Ravid Straussman is far from the only researcher to find the protective and deleterious effects of parasites in cancerous environments. Others have found that “besides parasites that can cause cancer directly, there are also parasites that can indirectly stimulate cancer development through various mechanisms.”
In fact, “infections with viruses, bacteria, and parasites have been recognized for years to be associated with human carcinogenicity.” Sadly but surely, “infection seems to play a crucial role in the etiology of cancer.”
So if parasites and cancer cells have a symbiotic - or at least complementary - relationship, is there a cause and effect? Is cancer caused by parasites or just a nice ancillary ‘perk’ of the buggers? Do the two just act to help one another?
While some researchers assert that certain parasites directly trigger oncogenesis, others are not so sure.
Regardless, two things seem to be inarguable. One, ivermectin - a known anti-parasitic - has a positive impact on cancers of all types. And two, the COVID-19 vaccine has been linked to highly aggressive and abnormal cancers.
Let that sink in for a moment. The same product that works against COVID-19 and was suppressed so the “vaccine” could be authorized, also treats one of the worst effects of that completely safe and effective “vaccine.”
Why did institutions and government bodies across the world have such a collective freak out and go to extreme lengths to demonize the drug, reduce its use, and allow patients to die from its denial?
Why was all this information known to various agencies, institutions, companies, and entities years prior to the outbreak, but kept from the public? Why were we told that only one thing was safe and effective, and then it turned out that thing was the complete opposite?
Sometimes, reality is exactly what you see and feel. So what do you see and feel? Because for me, it’s becoming increasingly hard to arrive at any other conclusion, than the one that’s most sinister of all.
Absolutely...
Unsure how I found you & this post, but sooo glad I did. Thank you!