INFANTOPHILIA

This one's almost too hard to write.

It doesn’t happen often, but sometimes I wonder if I should even bother.

We already know - well, most of us - just how sick and depraved and disgusting and whatever-other-diction-you’d-like-to-use these so-called people are…

After all, we’re talking about literal pedovores here.

We’re talking about humans that are, on at least some level, possessed by demonic energy, quite literally feeding on the suffering and pain of others. They’re about as far from human as you can humanly get.

In fact, I’m honestly not sure if these individuals are even real people, at this point, and I don’t mean that figuratively.

I’m really not sure…

---

---

But for now, I’ll put the lid on that wild conspiracy theory and address only the facts. That is, the files. The kind of documents that are most certainly not for the faint of heart. Especially in this case, where we’re talking about babies. Infants. Newborns.

What did Epstein and his cohorts like to do with babies, you ask?

Well, we already know damn well the majority of their Satanic activities, but one recently surfaced that hasn’t garnered much discussion.

Needless to say, I can understand why…

---

---

Now, if I had a clean mind and was in denial and didn’t want to contemplate the worst, I might assume that Epstein and Mark Tramo - an adjunct professor at the UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine - had benign reasons for this discussion.

Perhaps Epstein and Tramo, who exchanged roughly 1,200 emails, cared about newborns sucking “more vigorously” because they wanted to find a way to get them to self-soothe adaptively, to absorb their nutrients, to behave better, to do whatever better as part of improved physiological and neurological development.

How lovely it would be to be that naive…

---

---

So what’s behind all this?

It’s weird, isn’t it, that the “sucking” capabilities of infants are such an important topic of discussion, and a means of play, for these people, isn’t it? What would pedophiles, especially those who molest, rape, kill, and eat the youngest of humans, want with “more vigorous” oral stimulation?

It’s a revolting thing to think about, no doubt, but you can see where I’m going with this.

And, to put it all out there, why would Epstein be specifically interested in recording the mother’s voice of infants (who he undoubtedly captured) to increase said sucking capability?

Of course, unimaginable acts aside, there’s more to this oral fixation than meets the eye. Turns out, Epstein was absolutely obsessed, and there was even a proposed two-year research grant project expanding on this topic.

In fact, this topic goes well beyond absolutely depraved oral sex. It’s likely about something very transhuman, but completely plausible, given what we now know of Epstein and his circles.

Remember all that “Trust the Science” nonsense we were force-fed that the sheeple swallowed hook, line, and sinker?

Well, looks like Jeffrey Epstein and his fellow evildoers certainly did trust the science. Real science, however. The kind of authentic science that could probably actually benefit humanity; that is, if it weren’t perverted for the most sickening outcomes of all…

---

---

“The Jeffrey Epstein Project for Infant Brain Development undertakes a multi-center, prospective, randomized-controlled clinical trial investigating the effects of auditory enrichment on neurophysiological, behavioral, immunological, and endocrinological endpoints in Neonatal ICU patients. A unique, multi-disciplinary team of clinicians, neuroscientists, engineers, and musicians affiliated with The Institute for Music & Brain Science will combine expertise in perinatology, cortical physiology, cognitive psychology, and music composition and production in order to achieve the following goals:

• Quantify and objectify the benefits of non-pharmacological treatment — controlled auditory stimulation (e.g., vocal music during painful procedures; Tramo et al. 2006, Appendix) — on pain, stress, morbidity, mortality, and cost during the infants' NICU stay, and on morbidity and cognitive development during the first 2 years of life.

• Conduct this initial trial with sufficient rigor and power to publish its results in high-impact, peer-reviewed medical journals [e.g., Journal of the American Medical Association, Appendix] and qualify for funding of a large, multi-center clinical trial. 2 EFTA00296821 M1 Tramo GRANT PROPOSAL: The Jeffrey Epstein Project for Infant Brain Development

• Ultimately, translate our results into standardized protocols that will be implemented nationally and internationally in order to improve brain development and the achievement of cognitive milestones for millions of at-risk infants in future decades.”

---

---

Truth be told, this goes deeper than many people realize.

Let us not forget, Epstein was obsessed with seeding humanity with his DNA. He had women who were impregnated simply so he could use their babies for his nefarious purposes. For sex, for torture, for sacrifice, for consumption - but also for creating a superior race of humans, as he so saw fit.

Eugenics.

Which begs the question, why would Epstein be interested in a research project for brain development in “critically-ill infants”?

The answer is pretty clear. Children who are critically ill are easier test subjects. There are fewer ethical dilemmas, and given that these little ones likely experience consistent and high levels of pain and stress from their routine medical procedures, like pricks and intubations, they really are the ‘model’ population.

Why auditory enrichment in particular?

Well, its effects on the child could help to lower heart rate, lower cortisol levels, and improve other critical faculties and functions long-term. This would allow Epstein and his pals to learn how to modulate and control the mind states of their ‘slaves’ from a young age - a true lifelong grooming process on steroids.

---

---

Is it any surprise that Epstein loved wiping memories and eliminating free will with scopolamine?

But just think of the vulnerability and manipulability of preemies. Their neuroplasticity is ripe for the picking, making it easy to detect significant brain changes in small samples. And, as previously stated, such trials are easier to conduct in NICUs where parental consent and heavy monitoring are far more accessible.

Given this low-risk entry point and the cover excuse that they’re “saving” dying babies, the insidious research could then turn to enhancing healthy babies. After all, given the high mortality rate of critically-ill newborns, any fatal outcomes could just be blamed on the babies’ deteriorating health, not the flawed or malevolent protocols.

Again, Epstein and his mad scientist friends unequivocally loved the idea of eugenics.

---

---

As for others who couldn’t be enhanced? Disposable, dead, forgotten, burned in sulfuric acid, thrown off the Lolita Express over the ocean, buried somewhere in the New Mexico desert after “rough fetish sex.”

Then you have to consider the angle of supply chains. That is, supply chains for organs and tissue harvesting. Nothing like extracting goodies under the guise of benevolent research…

Not to mention the ritualistic nature of such activities. If there’s anything the Satanic Transhumanist Cabal loves most, it’s harvesting not just the physical, but the metaphysical, the dark, terrified, low-frequency energy that comes from taking the most pure form of humans - little boys & girls - and using them for ulterior purposes.

After all, if the “The Jeffrey Epstein Project for Brain Development in Critically-Ill Infants” could discover ways to supposedly “improve brain development and the achievement of cognitive milestones,” then it could likely be inverted to do the opposite.

Studying how to supposedly shorten and reduce pain and suffering could merely be the cover for studying how to prolong and intensify it.

Like engineering deadly pathogens under the guise of defense and protection…

One thing’s for certain - these demons-in-human-flesh couldn’t get enough of their babies, and it wasn’t because they were cute & cuddly.

---

---

Which, unfortunately, brings me back to the sexual aspect of all this that I first indicated at the start of this article…

There’s something that I can’t get out of my mind. A lot of this is hard to shake, of course, but there’s something I’ve been looking at, and I can’t seem to square it. Sadly, my mind goes to the darkest place possible, as I think such a place is unfortunately the most rational destination at this point.

Anything short, and I’d be lying to myself.

So what’s with the chairs?

I’m no dentist or orthodontist, but given what we know of Epstein’s dentist chairs on Little St. James and in his Palm Beach mansion, and given his connections with various ‘dentists’ and ‘doctors’ across the world, it’s hard not to think the absolute worst.

Were they removing teeth so that children couldn’t bite? So that they couldn’t fight back during the most depraved acts of all?

Whatever these fiends were doing - and I think we all have a good idea now - it appears nothing will ever happen. Even the supposed ‘big catch’ in the arrest of Prince Andrew had nothing to do with sex crimes, but rather alleged financial acts that likely angered some powerful bankers.

Will any of these sickos ever face real justice, for the worst of the worst that we all know intuitively they did? Will they ever do anything but step down from their companies or boards, as if that somehow excuses their wretched behaviors?

Or will they, like always seems to be the case, continue to flaunt it in our faces, laughing maniacally all the way to our graves?

---

---

---