43 Comments

Nicely said! And I, for one, look forward to more from you, especially about nanotech. It’s not my field but it interdigitates well with my own areas of medicine and Psychiatry.

Scarily well.

Expand full comment
author

it's all quite scary, isn't it?

Expand full comment
Sep 7Liked by Eccentrik

Always a supporter of truth tellers. Rare breed these days.

Expand full comment
Sep 8·edited Sep 8Liked by Eccentrik

Some 20 years ago, the well respected futurist, Ray Kurzweil and pal Terry Grossman wrote a book called Fantastic Voyage: Live long enough to live forever. In it, they discussed nano technologies in the making that included tiny robotic structures traveling around in the arteries cleaning things up. People who read your work or listen to John Campbell and think this is some sort of conspiracy theory need to wake up. These nanobot technologies are happening now and have been in the making for a very long time. Keep on keeping on! ❤️

Expand full comment

IMO you're right on all accounts. Though I think the waking up period is past, we do need to continue to help one another.

By continuing to sound the alarm, we are rallying more to applying their thoughts, energy, resources and creativity to finding remediation from the tech.

God Bless.

Expand full comment

You do an amazing job. I predict you will gain more subscruibers than you lose - lots more. Keep up the great work!

Expand full comment
author

thank you Bianca, I'll keep on keepin' on!

Expand full comment
Sep 7Liked by Eccentrik

Campbell’s move in the nano direction, even just the fact that he discussed it, was huge-even if people don’t grasp it. Maybe it is “true” or maybe it isn’t, but where is the solid refutation of it? I have seen none.

Expand full comment
Sep 9Liked by Eccentrik

He has subsequently pulled the video, as noted on his Twitter account.

Expand full comment

Speaking of $$, from what Naomi Wolf divulged in one of her recent articles, I accurately figured out that she's making about $300,000.00 per year off her Substack alone, and that's of course not counting whatever her organization and its Stack makes, as well as the royalties she gets from her books, etc. Even after all her several years of de-platforming, this is still a wealthy woman, and she wants everyone to send her more money. I also found out recently that she's a typical lying fraud because some time back, not too long ago, she claimed, even though she's "Jewish", to have become a "Christian", and then she very recently admitted that she is not a Christian, and promoted spiritualism and witchcraft (so-called "white magic", when there's no such thing; it's all evil) in that same article. She's still extremely enamored with this increasingly evil and vile world we live in, still an "al CIAduh(!)"-created feminist, (feminism was created by them), and she still wants to hob knob with the rich, famous and/or well-to-do politicians (all evil and also sold out to the world). In short, she too is still sold out to evil.

James 4:4. Naomi Wolf is a fraudster, like many if not most of the "medical freedom" people, mostly seeking $$, self and mutual aggrandizement, notoriety (at least with their fellow "freedom fighters"), hero worship (of themselves), and living large while the majority of people, including their patients, are increasingly just getting by, if that (but, hey, send them more money anyway and they'll save the country and the world). (Facetiousness.) They more and more sound like the globalists with a pretty mask on, "Pied Pipering" the sheep into the wolves' den so they can eat us alive (but, hey, keep the elitists who lost their opulent incomes due to their delicensing, and are now primarily seeking to replace those opulent incomes with just as opulent incomes so they can continue to live the opulent, elitist lifestyles that they were living before they were delicensed, at the expense of everyone except those like themselves, or those with more opulent lifestyles than they have. And they think they're fooling all of us.

As James 4:4 makes abundantly clear, these sold out to the love of money people have and/or are making themselves enemies of God. They are convincing duplicitous, narcissistic con artists in the guise of "doing good" (while actually really doing some good), "truly saving the planet and humankind", and the disguised "controlled-by-Satan-'opposition'" who rarely if ever give glory to God. And that last point is the most obvious sign to the truly-discerning that they are really fraudsters; who, though they put on a really good, worldly act, they are not at all truly repentant directly to God the Father in Jesus the Messiah's name, and completely transformed into nothing but "holy character" people that we must all become or we will be part of the mostly unrepentant, evil masses, and be lost to eternal death. All that when we could have known eternal bliss instead, and lived nothing but holy, unselfish lives for eternity. But, no, most people choose damnation over eternal life, though they were given every chance.

There's no more time to waste, folks; not that there ever was any time to waste. If you haven't already gotten nothing but truly, fully and completely right with your Maker, God the Father through Jesus the Messiah, the ONLY Way, Truth and Life (John 14:6), than now is the time to do so; because, soon, there will be no more chances to do so, you will have spurned God and His Hope (as most are doing), and have grieved away the Holy Spirit of God, the unpardonable sin/evil, and sealed your demise forever. No suffering for eternity in "hell", which is nothing but the grave, but only destruction and eternal death, if that is what you choose. That's right, whether you consciously realize it or not, you will have freely chosen it. Chosen to spurn God's promise of complete transformation and eternal life, for the opposite, eternal unconscious darkness, never to know any kind of life ever again. That's your free choice. So, without your wasting any more time, what's your choice, evil and nothing but death, or holiness and eternal life?

"...(C)hoose you this day who you will serve... but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord..."! (Joshua 24:15.)

Expand full comment

Naomi is basically a well-groomed "escort" seducing her "followers" (I detest that term on substack as I am a follower of Christ and no one else...) as per the dictates of her "call center" aka pimp. I am not being harsh, only clear.

There's feminism for ya! Yeah, Baby. Thanks for your comment. It's true IMO.

Expand full comment
author

I'll be honest, I haven't looked into Naomi that much, all I can say is that I've watched some of her interviews about fertility problems post-vax. If this is all legit, that's not good. All I can say is, in all cases, nothing surprises me these days :/

Expand full comment

She has done some good reporting and it's accurate as far as I know, but she's shilling for the upper crusty-s. She is completely enamored of their wealth and power and I do not trust her. She could be making an honest but modest living as an investigative journalist, but instead wants to be in the halls of power and like any courtesan, lives to serve those in power. That's what I mean by my snarky comments.

Do I know she's some kind of sex worker? I don't. But to me, prostitution can encompass a lot more than just bumpin' uglies.

I have written all this to her and she doesn't disagree. I personally don't get it. She has a choice and she's made it. Nuff said.

Expand full comment
author

" I have written all this to her and she doesn't disagree."

This is interesting, please elaborate...

Expand full comment

I was reading her articles and saw some patterns of kowtowing to the rich and famous and the power brokers and I asked her why she thought these people deserved her attentions and apologies for their narc behaviors when all I see in them is rather dimwitted narc stuff. Why she was participating with them was what I wanted to know. She never answered that, but did say I was right about the shallowness and her part in it. It seems she saw herself as resigned to participation with them. Indentured or something? IDK.

It went on from there in regards to other similar articles she wrote. Then I stopped reading her articles.

My original snarky point being, if you are a woman who is beholden to and under the control of the powers that be how can you call yourself a feminist? That's just being owned like any other owned woman. Like a cow or an escort or a prostitute....

Expand full comment
Sep 9·edited Sep 9Liked by Eccentrik

Postscript---One needs to subtract whatever Substack's cut of that $300k is, but it can't be that high of a percentage, so she's still gleaning close to that amount just from that one Stack alone.

Expand full comment
author

300k??

good grief...

Expand full comment

Thank you - much appreciated.

Please stay strong and enjoy the journey!

Expand full comment
Sep 7Liked by Eccentrik

Photius reportedly said when he heard he had won a award and was getting popular

" what have I done amiss"?

Expand full comment
author

haha fortunately I don't have that problem (yet)

Expand full comment

Please keep stepping right on forward... 🕯️

Expand full comment

I was happy to hear about the evidence for nanotech's being in the toxxine.

Expand full comment
author

people have been saying this since they first rolled out and they were, of course, dismissed and demonized

Expand full comment

Thanks for this article and your transparency. Very good to know you are steering your course.

Staying true to one's higher inclinations is the best each of us can personally accomplish.

If it causes some people to go away, well, good. God Bless.

Expand full comment
Sep 7Liked by Eccentrik

I appreciate your transparency and all the effort you put out.

Curious why you wrote this in mixed case: cOnSpIrAcY tHeOrIsT?

Expand full comment
author

it's how I imagine some Karens saying it, with their voices all shaky and shrill ;)

Expand full comment
Sep 12Liked by Eccentrik

When your 'reptile brain' kicks in and 'flight' reigns supreme, you will run. So be it. We no longer live in times where we have the luxury of time to drip feed people truth bombs until a critical mass of people wake the heck up and 'take it to the man'.

Like you I'm naturally curious and will always delve into information that's sometimes explosive. But I won't look away. And like the rest of your followers, I will defend your information as explosive but factual to everybody I speak about it to. Not many people can frame such information the way you can/have, it's why many of us will remain firmly in your corner; drip feeding your research to those stirring millions.

You're over the target, and far from 'winchester'.

Keep going, bro.

Expand full comment
author

I really appreciate that, thank you, and I will.

Expand full comment
Sep 11Liked by Eccentrik

Please don’t stop!!

Expand full comment

I have an obsession with nanotech too, especially after learning there’s a good likelihood I'm seeded with it. Never vaxxed or tested for CV19. Good to find your page and see others open to the discussion.

Expand full comment
author

definitely something we all need to talk about.

how do you think you're seeded with it?

Expand full comment
deletedSep 9·edited Sep 9
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
author

that's crazy, specific body parts? I remembering hearing anecdotes from just the jabbed, but nothing would surprise me!

Expand full comment

I updated my comment with more details. That was the reason why I checked myself , as a joke because I thought the magnetic vids were being circulated to make those who were against the cv19 vax look nuts…

Expand full comment
author

wow... some previous vaccine/injection? exposure to jabbed? work around emf devices? 5g? just an anomalous reaction to all that and then some? I'm trying to brainstorm reasons how this could happen. but I believe you. do you still have weird sensations/other symptoms?

Expand full comment
deletedSep 10
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Im not covid vaxxed . Never tested for cv19 either just to be clear. Last vax I got was a tetanus around 2008.

Expand full comment