"I've heard numbers of like 1 in 200 thousand, 1 in 100 thousand," Trump said of decades prior, "and now I'm hearing numbers of 1 in 100, so something's wrong."
I think RFK, Jr. has gained Trump's confidence and now Trump is understanding the truth about the poisonous injections. Karen Kingston says in an interview this week: "The December 4, 2024, Mar-a-lago meeting with BioPharma execs wasn't about curing cancer. It was about cutting ties with China and pulling the mRNA shots off of the market." (https://substack.com/home/post/p-153140482 )
this is very good news. there are ways to incentivize these companies to make people healthier, but the pharma business model has been set in stone for far too long. hopefully that can be chipped away!
They both should understand about all vaccines, even polio. Sherri Tenpenny speaks about that in the book she wrote on shots of all kinds. Look her up.
I love Sherri Tenpenny....I began following her early in the plandemic...there is so much wisdom and courage and spirit-filled eloquence in her communications.
I agree and have been following her since 2008. So does westonaprice.org on all shots: they are useless and harmful! Just follow the money! You might also check out the Price group I just mentioned, You will learn a lot from them too about no shots and very healthy eating.
Tenpenny was one of the first I saw to detail the multiple mechanisms of action the COVID "vaccines" would exploit to cause harm. Truly ahead of the curve
That was in 2008 that she came on the public scene. Judy Mikovits' books came out about five years before C19. But Andrew Saul and other vitamin C mavens have been shouting against viruses since it was invented (around the 1940s).
I've heard? If Mr. T was that interested why does he not investigate or get Kennedy to fill him in at warp speed as the situation is getting worse than 1 in 100 and will ultimately have no births without autism if allowed to continue. It could be as simple as to many cocktails of jabs far to young. Having no long term trials coupled with no Pharma liability was to good an opportunity to put all trialled medicines into compensation free jabs with cheap minimum toxicity trials.
You can have symptoms at the same time as someone else from:
Shared trauma (conflict shocks) most likely, ruling out shared poisoning and shared malnutrition. Eg, a situation that really "stinks" or is "hard to swallow" that affects the whole household at the same time. Moving, loss of pet, shared triggers (winter, holidays, foods, etc), arguments, loss of job, etc.
Contagion could possibly occur through electrical/ morphic/ aural fields, but lots of research needs to be done there.
See German New Medicine GHK for a fun rabbit hole on how shocking events can make us "sick." Look up Melissa Sell, Helmut Pilhar, and Ilsadora Laker to learn more. Eybl's book "The Psychic Roots of Disease" is a great place to start.
Power of suggestion.
Biofields.
If a tree can communicate across a field to another tree that some toxic is present, don’t you think a whole family will send the same intelligence? To get all bodies to run their body dishwasher and detox . Same deal here with my family.. first time I held this perspective as tough as it was.
I'm totally onboard with this, just based on anecdotes from my own life. We are electrochemical entities, with so much unseen and unmeasured as of yet, so this seems totally likely. Thanks for the references!
In March of 1919 Rosenau & Keegan conducted 9 separate experiments in a group of 49 healthy men, to prove contagion. In all 9 experiments, 0/49 men became sick after being exposed to sick people or the bodily fluids of sick people. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/221687
In November 1919, 8 separate experiments were conducted by Rosenau et al. in a group of 62 men trying to prove that influenza is contagious and causes disease. In all 8 experiments, 0/62 men became sick. Another set of 8 experiments were undertaken in December of 1919 by McCoy et al. in 50 men to try and prove contagion. Once again, all 8 experiments failed to prove people with influenza, or their bodily fluids cause illness. 0/50 men became sick. In 1919, Wahl et al. conducted 3 separate experiments to infect 6 healthy men with influenza by exposing them to mucous secretions and lung tissue from sick people. 0/6 men contracted influenza in any of the three studies. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30082102?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
In 1921, Williams et al. tried to experimentally infect 45 healthy men with the common cold and influenza, by exposing them to mucous secretions from sick people. 0/45 became ill. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19869857/
In 1930, Dochez et al. attempted to infect a group of men experimentally with the common cold. The authors stated in their results, something that is nothing short of amazing. “It was apparent very early that this individual was more or less unreliable and from the start it was possible to keep him in the dark regarding our procedure. He had inconspicuous symptoms after his test injection of sterile broth and no more striking results from the cold filtrate, until an assistant, on the second day after injection, inadvertently referred to this failure to contract a cold. That evening and night the subject reported severe symptomatology, including sneezing, cough, sore throat and stuffiness in the nose. The next morning he was told that he had been misinformed in regard to the nature of the filtrate and his symptoms subsided within the hour. It is important to note that there was an entire absence of objective pathological changes”. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19869798/
71-Bridges et al, 2003 - "Our review found no human experimental studies published in the English-language literature delineating person-to-person transmission of influenza... Thus, most information on human-to-human transmission of influenza comes from studies of human inoculation with influenza virus and observational studies."
72-The Virology Journal, 2008- "There were five attempts to demonstrate sick-to-well influenza transmission in the desperate days following the pandemic [1918 flu] and all were 'singularly fruitless'... all five studies failed to support sick-to-well transmission, in spite of having numerous acutely ill influenza patients, in various stages of their illness, carefully cough, spit, and breathe on a combined total of >150 well patients.
73-Public Health Reports, 2010- "It seemed that what was acknowledged to be one of the most contagious of communicable diseases [1918 flu] could not be transferred under experimental conditions."
74-T.C. Sutton et al. 2014 "Throughout all ferret studies, we did not observe an increase in sneezing, and a febrile response (i.e.. elevation of body temperature) was inconsistent and was not a prominent feature of infection."
75. Jasmin Kutter, 2018-There is a substantial lack of (experimental) evidence on the transmission routes of
PIV (types 1-4) and HMPV.
Extensive human rhinovirus transmission experiments have not led to a widely accepted view on the transmission route- However, until today, results on the relative importance of droplet and aerosol transmission of influenza viruses stay inconclusive and hence, there are many reviews intensively discussing this issue.
76-J.S. Kutter, 2021 - "Besides nasal discharge, no other signs of illness were observed in the A/HINI virus-positive donor and indirect recipient animals." The animals were subsequently euthanized after the animals experienced what the scientist described as having breathing difficulties (Nasal Discharge) with no details provided of labored breath.
76- Dr Robert Wilner in 1994 injected himself with AIDS positive blood multiple times, never testing positive nor facing any symptoms of disease. Conveniently died of a heart attack 4 months later after being outspoken.
77-Dr Thomas Powell 1897, injected Cholera, Bubonic Plague and never got sick.
78-Dr Fraser 1939-"...if you ask why thousands of men carry germs without injury to themselves the replies vary, but all are unsatisfactory. If you examine the standard works on bacteriology you find no positive proof given, that germs, if taken in food or drink, are harmful".
The idea of an immune system was created by pharmaceutical companies circa 1919, the purpose being to sell us vaccines and drugs. What living beings have is a lymphatic system. The lymphatic system consists of the liver, stomach, spleen, neutrophils, leukocytes, lymphocytes, bacteria, fungi, and many more.
Germ theory was debunked by Antoine Béchamp in the 1800s.
Germ theory was debunked by Milton Rosenau in 1919 where he tried over 700 times to spread influenza from the sick to the healthy by having them cough on them and other methods, all instances were negative.
Germ theory was debunked by Stefan Lanka in the 2000s.
It is only propaganda and "wives tales" that make us believe a microscopic organism hijacks your body and makes you reproduce it.
The only way this ends is through a paradigm shift; we must all learn that no virus has ever been proven and that no controls have ever proven contagion.
We do not get sick from each other or microorganisms, our body performs a detoxification after all of the: 5g, wifi, toxic water, toxic food, toxic air, depleted soil, LED, vaccines, pharmaceuticals, lack of exercise, lack of sunlight, lack of love.
We are responsible for our own health. You can not catch health, you can not catch illness.
Virus is a scapegoat for man-made toxins and Pasteur was a fraud. The 1919 Rosenau and Keegan studies show you can not catch flu even when swapping snot.
Please join us on the group healthandtruth on telegram. Thank you for your time.
I think RFK, Jr. has gained Trump's confidence and now Trump is understanding the truth about the poisonous injections. Karen Kingston says in an interview this week: "The December 4, 2024, Mar-a-lago meeting with BioPharma execs wasn't about curing cancer. It was about cutting ties with China and pulling the mRNA shots off of the market." (https://substack.com/home/post/p-153140482 )
this is very good news. there are ways to incentivize these companies to make people healthier, but the pharma business model has been set in stone for far too long. hopefully that can be chipped away!
They both should understand about all vaccines, even polio. Sherri Tenpenny speaks about that in the book she wrote on shots of all kinds. Look her up.
I love Sherri Tenpenny....I began following her early in the plandemic...there is so much wisdom and courage and spirit-filled eloquence in her communications.
I agree and have been following her since 2008. So does westonaprice.org on all shots: they are useless and harmful! Just follow the money! You might also check out the Price group I just mentioned, You will learn a lot from them too about no shots and very healthy eating.
Tenpenny was one of the first I saw to detail the multiple mechanisms of action the COVID "vaccines" would exploit to cause harm. Truly ahead of the curve
That was in 2008 that she came on the public scene. Judy Mikovits' books came out about five years before C19. But Andrew Saul and other vitamin C mavens have been shouting against viruses since it was invented (around the 1940s).
I can only imagine being awake that long - must be infinitely frustrating!
I started study nutrition on my own around 1981 after college and then my graduate work started in 20024 and haven't stopped since.
I've heard? If Mr. T was that interested why does he not investigate or get Kennedy to fill him in at warp speed as the situation is getting worse than 1 in 100 and will ultimately have no births without autism if allowed to continue. It could be as simple as to many cocktails of jabs far to young. Having no long term trials coupled with no Pharma liability was to good an opportunity to put all trialled medicines into compensation free jabs with cheap minimum toxicity trials.
many problems indeed. no transparency, no accountability, no reliable controls, no longitudinal trials, etc.
You can have symptoms at the same time as someone else from:
Shared trauma (conflict shocks) most likely, ruling out shared poisoning and shared malnutrition. Eg, a situation that really "stinks" or is "hard to swallow" that affects the whole household at the same time. Moving, loss of pet, shared triggers (winter, holidays, foods, etc), arguments, loss of job, etc.
Contagion could possibly occur through electrical/ morphic/ aural fields, but lots of research needs to be done there.
See German New Medicine GHK for a fun rabbit hole on how shocking events can make us "sick." Look up Melissa Sell, Helmut Pilhar, and Ilsadora Laker to learn more. Eybl's book "The Psychic Roots of Disease" is a great place to start.
Power of suggestion.
Biofields.
If a tree can communicate across a field to another tree that some toxic is present, don’t you think a whole family will send the same intelligence? To get all bodies to run their body dishwasher and detox . Same deal here with my family.. first time I held this perspective as tough as it was.
I'm totally onboard with this, just based on anecdotes from my own life. We are electrochemical entities, with so much unseen and unmeasured as of yet, so this seems totally likely. Thanks for the references!
In March of 1919 Rosenau & Keegan conducted 9 separate experiments in a group of 49 healthy men, to prove contagion. In all 9 experiments, 0/49 men became sick after being exposed to sick people or the bodily fluids of sick people. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/221687
In November 1919, 8 separate experiments were conducted by Rosenau et al. in a group of 62 men trying to prove that influenza is contagious and causes disease. In all 8 experiments, 0/62 men became sick. Another set of 8 experiments were undertaken in December of 1919 by McCoy et al. in 50 men to try and prove contagion. Once again, all 8 experiments failed to prove people with influenza, or their bodily fluids cause illness. 0/50 men became sick. In 1919, Wahl et al. conducted 3 separate experiments to infect 6 healthy men with influenza by exposing them to mucous secretions and lung tissue from sick people. 0/6 men contracted influenza in any of the three studies. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30082102?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
In 1921, Williams et al. tried to experimentally infect 45 healthy men with the common cold and influenza, by exposing them to mucous secretions from sick people. 0/45 became ill. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19869857/
In 1924, Robertson & Groves exposed 100 healthy individuals to the bodily secretions from 16 different people suffering from influenza. The authors concluded that 0/100 became sick as a result of being exposed to the bodily secretions. https://academic.oup.com/jid/article-abstract/34/4/400/832936?redirectedFrom=fulltextA
In 1930, Dochez et al. attempted to infect a group of men experimentally with the common cold. The authors stated in their results, something that is nothing short of amazing. “It was apparent very early that this individual was more or less unreliable and from the start it was possible to keep him in the dark regarding our procedure. He had inconspicuous symptoms after his test injection of sterile broth and no more striking results from the cold filtrate, until an assistant, on the second day after injection, inadvertently referred to this failure to contract a cold. That evening and night the subject reported severe symptomatology, including sneezing, cough, sore throat and stuffiness in the nose. The next morning he was told that he had been misinformed in regard to the nature of the filtrate and his symptoms subsided within the hour. It is important to note that there was an entire absence of objective pathological changes”. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19869798/
In 1937 Burnet & Lush conducted an experiment exposing 200 healthy people to bodily secretions from people infected with influenza. 0/200 became sick. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2065253/
In 1940, Burnet and Foley tried to experimentally infect 15 university students with influenza. The authors concluded their experiment was a failure. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1940.tb79929.x
71-Bridges et al, 2003 - "Our review found no human experimental studies published in the English-language literature delineating person-to-person transmission of influenza... Thus, most information on human-to-human transmission of influenza comes from studies of human inoculation with influenza virus and observational studies."
72-The Virology Journal, 2008- "There were five attempts to demonstrate sick-to-well influenza transmission in the desperate days following the pandemic [1918 flu] and all were 'singularly fruitless'... all five studies failed to support sick-to-well transmission, in spite of having numerous acutely ill influenza patients, in various stages of their illness, carefully cough, spit, and breathe on a combined total of >150 well patients.
73-Public Health Reports, 2010- "It seemed that what was acknowledged to be one of the most contagious of communicable diseases [1918 flu] could not be transferred under experimental conditions."
74-T.C. Sutton et al. 2014 "Throughout all ferret studies, we did not observe an increase in sneezing, and a febrile response (i.e.. elevation of body temperature) was inconsistent and was not a prominent feature of infection."
75. Jasmin Kutter, 2018-There is a substantial lack of (experimental) evidence on the transmission routes of
PIV (types 1-4) and HMPV.
Extensive human rhinovirus transmission experiments have not led to a widely accepted view on the transmission route- However, until today, results on the relative importance of droplet and aerosol transmission of influenza viruses stay inconclusive and hence, there are many reviews intensively discussing this issue.
76-J.S. Kutter, 2021 - "Besides nasal discharge, no other signs of illness were observed in the A/HINI virus-positive donor and indirect recipient animals." The animals were subsequently euthanized after the animals experienced what the scientist described as having breathing difficulties (Nasal Discharge) with no details provided of labored breath.
76- Dr Robert Wilner in 1994 injected himself with AIDS positive blood multiple times, never testing positive nor facing any symptoms of disease. Conveniently died of a heart attack 4 months later after being outspoken.
77-Dr Thomas Powell 1897, injected Cholera, Bubonic Plague and never got sick.
78-Dr Fraser 1939-"...if you ask why thousands of men carry germs without injury to themselves the replies vary, but all are unsatisfactory. If you examine the standard works on bacteriology you find no positive proof given, that germs, if taken in food or drink, are harmful".
The idea of an immune system was created by pharmaceutical companies circa 1919, the purpose being to sell us vaccines and drugs. What living beings have is a lymphatic system. The lymphatic system consists of the liver, stomach, spleen, neutrophils, leukocytes, lymphocytes, bacteria, fungi, and many more.
Germ theory was debunked by Antoine Béchamp in the 1800s.
Germ theory was debunked by Milton Rosenau in 1919 where he tried over 700 times to spread influenza from the sick to the healthy by having them cough on them and other methods, all instances were negative.
Germ theory was debunked by Stefan Lanka in the 2000s.
It is only propaganda and "wives tales" that make us believe a microscopic organism hijacks your body and makes you reproduce it.
The only way this ends is through a paradigm shift; we must all learn that no virus has ever been proven and that no controls have ever proven contagion.
We do not get sick from each other or microorganisms, our body performs a detoxification after all of the: 5g, wifi, toxic water, toxic food, toxic air, depleted soil, LED, vaccines, pharmaceuticals, lack of exercise, lack of sunlight, lack of love.
We are responsible for our own health. You can not catch health, you can not catch illness.
Virus is a scapegoat for man-made toxins and Pasteur was a fraud. The 1919 Rosenau and Keegan studies show you can not catch flu even when swapping snot.
Please join us on the group healthandtruth on telegram. Thank you for your time.