6 Comments

I’m not sure the ship *lost power. Of course I can’t verify this statement, so maybe i shouldn’t post it, but I have read reports it was traveling at 25 knots—maximum power, the diesel engine smoking ferociously at full capacity, rather than drifting down to a slower speed by loss of power, in an area typically traversed at 5 knots. It may have been fully powered, “full speed ahead”.

Remember when the cops prevented evacuation in Lahaina? Conversely, it hs been reported there are *no cops in some areas of Baltimore. The same day the bridge is taken down in Baltimore, the Baltimore PD implodes on itself. Taking down the bridge might be to prevent, or at least control, evacuation, or escape, in the near future:

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/baltimore-implodes-police-force-collapses-only-three-officers-patrolled-major-district

How I hope I’m wrong.

Expand full comment

Right before it sank, the Titanic also lost its power briefly, regained it, and then lost it for good. Almost seems like this is an Illuminati signaling event.

Expand full comment

The whole bridge collapsed

What engineer would have put one weak spot into a bridge that long. At most a section should have broke.

Crew working on the bridge, setting up the fall at impact. 911 - on a bridge to far

Expand full comment

Odds are at least 1 in a million for a ship that size, moving that fast, hitting the bridge support just right. Gotta be pure chance. (Wink, wink.) Nothing to see, but a black swan event.

Expand full comment

What do polls have to do with the facts of what happened? But thank you for raising the thought-provoking questions.

Expand full comment

I fear you may all be correct! God help us!

Expand full comment